|
Traditional Process Layout
|
The resulting overall material
flow between functional cells. |
|
Product Layout
|
The resulting smooth material
flow between dedicated product groups. |
Complex material flow systems resulting from process based production layouts
have long throughput times, high inventories and work in progress, which increase
cost and reduce profitability. From the organisation’s point of view, delegation
and control are difficult to implement, which leads to bureaucratic and centralised
management structures, thus increasing overhead. Applying PFA produces
a plan to change the layout and organisation in such a way that production
throughput times can be reduced radically, while at the same time inventories
go down and delivery punctuality and quality improve to a completely new level.
QDC has applied the method successfully in several manufacturing industries,
especially in job-shops and electronics industries, but good results have
also been obtained in service industries. Once the layout has been changed
to a product based one, new and simple production scheduling routines have
been implemented to ensure excellent delivery performance.
Companies
that have gone through PFA and the resulting change to product based layout,
have experienced the following positive effects:
· in operations management: reduced production throughput times, significantly less capital tied into the material flow and improved delivery performance;
· in general management: makes it possible to delegate the responsibility for component quality, cost and completion by due-date to the group level, which in turn reduced overhead;
· in worker’s motivation: clearer responsibilities and decision making on the spot increase job satisfaction;
·
in the point of information technology:
simplified material flow speeds up the implementation of factory automation
and simplifies software applications used to support efficient operations.
The
main method of the PFA is a quantitative analysis of all the material flows
taking place in the factory, and using this information and the alternative
routings to form manufacturing groups that are able to finish a set parts
with the resources dedicated to it. Depending on the scale of the project
this logic is applied on company, factory, group, line and tooling level respectively.
Whichever the case, the work breaks down into the following steps:
· to identify and classify all production resources, machines and equipment;
· to track the all product and part routes that the company, factory or group produces;
· to analyse the manufacturing network through the main flows formed by the majority of parts;
· to study alternative routings and grouping of the machines to fit parts into a simplified material flow system;
· to further study those exceptional parts not fitting into the grouping of production resources;
·
to validate the new material flow system and
implementing the scheduling system based on single-piece flow.
Most
production units and their layouts are the result of organic growth, during
which the products have experienced many changes affecting the arsenal of
the equipment in the workshop. This continuously evolving change process leads
in conventional factories into complex material flow systems. PFA reveals
the natural grouping of production resources like the following small-scale
yet real-world example shows.
The Machine-Part matrix as raw data gathered in the first steps of the PFA
|
The Machine-Part matrix reorganised into natural groups that finish parts.
|
Most
of our previous cases have focused on the forming of groups in job-shops,
which are part of a larger production facility. These test cases have been
used as eye-openers for the rest of the organisation. Our recommendation,
however, is to continue with PFA on higher level. Product and component allocation
in the whole supply chain combined with product and customer segmentation
is an area where not only vast savings in operating costs can be achieved,
but also competitive advantage can be created.
Manufacturing science knows numerous cases where complete product-oriented re-organisation of the company has produced staggering results in productivity, throughput times and competitive advantage. PFA is one of the few systematic engineering methods for achieving these results.
Production Flow Analysis was developed by Professor John L. Burbidge of the Cranfield Institute of Technology.
Contact: info@qdc.fi